+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: What evidence is there to support the phlogiston theory?

  1. #1
    Level 1 - Newbie adonai's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    1,063

    What evidence is there to support the phlogiston theory?

    What evidence is there to support the phlogiston theory? My daughter needs help with her homework.

  2. Sponsors
    Super ModeratorPeeje's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    164
    Videos
    139

  3. #2
    Level 16 - Colossus Lillian4ever's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    2,183
    Since it was an early attempt to understand the mechanics of combustion, the principle evidence to support it was the loss of mass of substances as they burned. Suffice to say, this only worked as evidence with a highly limited data set.

  4. #3
    Level 1 - Newbie alicia's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    1,111
    see this web site
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phlogiston_theory

    There is no evidence for this.
    The evidence is that combustion uses oxygen.

  5. #4
    Level 7 - I know you and your Friends wwang's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    1,314
    where there's smoke, there's fire .

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts